Publication: Assessing sources of uncertainty in formaldehyde air mass factors over tropical South America: Implications for top-down isoprene emission estimates
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2012
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Barkley, Michael P., Thomas P. Kurosu, Kelly Chance, Isabelle De Smedt, Michel Van Roozendael, Almut Arneth, Daniel Hagberg, and Alex Guenther. 2012. “Assessing Sources of Uncertainty in Formaldehyde Air Mass Factors over Tropical South America: Implications for Top-down Isoprene Emission Estimates.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117 (D13): n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016827.
Research Data
Abstract
We use a nested-grid version of the GEOS-Chem chemistry transport model, constrained by isoprene emissions from the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN), and the Lund-Potsdam-Jena General Ecosystem Simulator (LPJ-GUESS) bottom-up inventories, to evaluate the impact that surface isoprene emissions have on formaldehyde (HCHO) air-mass factors (AMFs) and vertical column densities (VCDs) over tropical South America during 2006, as observed by the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) and Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI). Although the large-scale seasonal variability of monthly mean HCHO VCDs is typically unaffected by the choice of bottom-up inventory, large relative differences of up to +/- 45% in the HCHO VCD can occur for individual regions and months, but typically most VCD differences are of order +/- 20%. These relative changes are comparable to those produced by other sources of uncertainty in the AMF including aerosols and surface albedo, but less than those from clouds. In a sensitivity test, we find that top-down annual isoprene emissions inferred from SCIAMACHY and OMI HCHO vertical columns can vary by as much as +/- 30-50% for each instrument respectively, depending on the region studied and the a priori isoprene emissions used. Our analysis suggests that the influence of the a priori isoprene emissions on HCHO AMFs and VCDs is therefore non-negligible and must be carefully considered when inferring top-down isoprene emissions estimates over this, or potentially any other, region.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service