DASH
Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Browse DASH
DASH Stories
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  3. SPH Scholarly Articles
  4. Best Practices for Benchmarking Germline Small Variant Calls in Human Genomes

Best Practices for Benchmarking Germline Small Variant Calls in Human Genomes

Open/View files
270157.full.pdf (545.54 KB)
Date
February 23, 2018
Author(s)
Krusche, Peter
Trigg, Len
Boutros, Paul C
Mason, Christopher E
De La Vega, Francisco M
Moore, Benjamin L
Gonzalez-Porta, Mar
Eberle, Michael A
Tezak, Zivana
Labadibi, Samir
Truty, Rebecca
Asimenos, George
Funke, Birgit
Fleharty, Mark
Salit, Marc
Zook, Justin M
DOI
10.1101/270157
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Krusche, Peter, Len Trigg, Paul C Boutros, Christopher E Mason, Francisco M De La Vega, Benjamin L Moore, Mar Gonzalez-Porta, et al. “Best Practices for Benchmarking Germline Small Variant Calls in Human Genomes.” BioRxiv, May 24, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/270157.
Abstract
Standardized benchmarking methods and tools are essential to robust accuracy assessment of NGS variant calling. Benchmarking variant calls requires careful attention to definitions of performance metrics, sophisticated comparison approaches, and stratification by variant type and genome context. To address these needs, the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) Benchmarking Team convened representatives from sequencing technology developers, government agencies, academic bioinformatics researchers, clinical laboratories, and commercial technology and bioinformatics developers for whom benchmarking variant calls is essential to their work. This team addressed challenges in (1) matching variant calls with different representations, (2) defining standard performance metrics, (3) enabling stratification of performance by variant type and genome context, and (4) developing and describing limitations of high-confidence calls and regions that can be used as "truth". Our methods are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/ga4gh/benchmarking-tools) and in a web-based app on precisionFDA, which allow users to compare their variant calls against truth sets and to obtain a standardized report on their variant calling performance. Our methods have been piloted in the precisionFDA variant calling challenges to identify the best-in-class variant calling methods within high-confidence regions. Finally, we recommend a set of best practices for using our tools and critically evaluating the results.
Terms of Use
Metadata Only
URI
https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37371853
Project(s)
Nature Biotechnology
Collection
SPH Scholarly Articles
Metrics
Repository logo
  • CONTACT US
  • OSRDS
  • ABOUT DASH
  • DEPOSITING TO DASH
  • TERMS OF USE
  • REQUEST A WAIVER
  • TAKE DOWN POLICY
  • NAME CHANGE POLICY
  • HARVARD OA POLICIES
  • DASH SUBMITTER AGREEMENT
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
Creative Commons License BY
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which allows anyone to share and adapt our material as long as proper attribution is given.
For details and exceptions, see the Harvard Library Copyright Policy
©2024 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.