Publication:
Matters Arising: Response to Crossley et al. 2020: Meta-analysis of Insect Temporal Trends Must Account for the Complex Sampling Histories Inherent to Many Long-term Monitoring Efforts

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2020

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer-Nature
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Welti, Ellen A. R., Anthony Joern, Aaron M. Ellison, David Lightfoot, et.al. "Matters Arising: Response to Crossley et al. 2020: Meta-analysis of Insect Temporal Trends Must Account for the Complex Sampling Histories Inherent to Many Long-term Monitoring Efforts," 2020. In response to: Crossley et al. 2020. No net insect abundance and diversity declines across US Long Term 9 Ecological Research sites. Nature Ecology & Evolution (2020) doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1269-4.

Research Data

Abstract

In an article recently published in Nature Ecology & Evolution (Crossley et al. 2020 “No net insect abundance and diversity declines across US Long Term Ecological Research sites”), sampling effort within Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) datasets was assumed to be consistent across years. Given the complex history of many long-term datasets at LTER sites, this assumption does not often hold and we believe this assumption led to errors in Crossley et al.’s analysis. Here we first use the Konza Prairie grasshopper dataset as an example of how changes in sampling locations and effort can cause errors when data are assumed to be collected with invariant sampling. Second, we describe similar and additional errors in data use from 7 of the 13 LTER sites included in Crossley et al. (2020)’s analysis.

Description

Preprint posted on ecoevoRxiv: https://ecoevorxiv.org/v3sr2/

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories