Publication:

Gerrymandering or “Gloria”-mandering? An examination of redistricting effects on women candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2023-06-30

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Zhou, Amy X. 2023. Gerrymandering or “Gloria”-mandering? An examination of redistricting effects on women candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives. Bachelor's thesis, Harvard College.

Abstract

In 2022, for the first time since the 2018 midterm elections, the U.S. House of Representatives did not see a significant increase in the number of women elected, despite past literature indicating that redistricting is often helpful for women candidates by decreasing the incumbency effect. At the same time, significant research media attention has been dedicated to researching the effects of the 2020 redistricting cycle on partisanship and voting behavior. I connect these two issues by using machine learning models to examine the effects of the 2020 redistricting cycle on the likelihood of women running for Congress. These models revealed that redistricting has positive effects on women-candidacy in the years immediately following the redistricting cycle by increasing the number of open seats, however the process of map drawing overall skews towards a bias against women by way of partisan gerrymandering.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Public policy

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories