Publication:

Methods for Pooling Results of Epidemiologic Studies the Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2006

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Smith-Warner, Stephanie A., Donna Spiegelman, John Ritz, Demetrius Albanes, W. Lawrence Beeson, Leslie Bernstein, Franco Berrino, et al. 2006. “Methods for Pooling Results of Epidemiologic Studies.” American Journal of Epidemiology 163 (11): 1053–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj127.

Abstract

With the growing number of epidemiologic publications on the relation between dietary factors and cancer risk, pooled analyses that summarize results from multiple studies are becoming more common. Here, the authors describe the methods being used to summarize data on diet-cancer associations within the ongoing Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer, begun in 1991. In the Pooling Project, the primary data from prospective cohort studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria are analyzed using standardized criteria for modeling of exposure, confounding, and outcome variables. In addition to evaluating main exposure-disease associations, analyses are also conducted to evaluate whether exposure-disease associations are modified by other dietary and nondietary factors or vary among population subgroups or particular cancer subtypes. Study-specific relative risks are calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model and then pooled using a random- or mixed-effects model. The study-specific estimates are weighted by the inverse of their variances in forming summary estimates. Most of the methods used in the Pooling Project may be adapted for examining associations with dietary and nondietary factors in pooled analyses of case-control studies or case-control and cohort studies combined.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories