Publication: Confidence Intervals for Heterogeneity Measures in Meta-analysis
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2013
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Oxford University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Takkouche, B., P. Khudyakov, J. Costa-Bouzas, and D. Spiegelman. 2013. “Confidence Intervals for Heterogeneity Measures in Meta-Analysis.” American Journal of Epidemiology 178 (6): 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt060.
Research Data
Abstract
Two methods of quantifying heterogeneity between studies in meta-analysis were studied. One method quantified the proportion of the total variance of the effect estimate due to variation between studies (R-I), and the other calibrated the variance between studies to the size of the effect itself through a between-study coefficient of variation (CVB). Bootstrap and asymptotic confidence intervals for R-I and CVB were derived and evaluated in an extensive simulation study that covered a wide range of scenarios likely to be encountered in practice. The best performance was given by asymptotic Wald confidence intervals developed for R-I and CVB. The use of these heterogeneity measures together with their confidence intervals was illustrated in 5 typical meta-analyses. A new user-friendly SAS macro (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) is provided to implement these methods for routine use and can be downloaded at the last author's website.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
Metadata Only