Race Rendered Theologically: The Entangled Theological and Racial Discourse of Josiah Strong, 1885-1915
Date
2021
Author(s)
Sacco, Antonette M.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Sacco, Antonette M. 2021. "Race Rendered Theologically: The Entangled Theological and Racial Discourse of Josiah Strong, 1885-1915." Harvard Divinity School.
Abstract
Analyzing the relationship between white mainline Protestant theology and white supremacy in the twentieth-century United States raises methodological challenges because of the coded language of dog-whistle politics and color-blind racism, and the shifting categories of whiteness, Christian, and American. The challenge is how to identify the racial implications of theological arguments not explicitly marked as such. This paper examines how theological constructs explicitly linked to white supremacist projects may continue to replicate whiteness and racial logics even when they become detached from explicit racial markers by tracking the shifting theo-racial discourse of white U.S. Congregationalist minister Josiah Strong from 1885-1915. Drawing on Ann Stoler’s theorization of the “polyvalent mobility” of racial discourse, I demonstrate how racial essentialisms entwined in Strong’s theological discourse shift while the grammar of an evolutionary logic that hierarchizes categories of being based on these shifting essentialisms remains consistent. The result is a subsuming of racial grammar into a more narrowly articulated theological discourse, and the subsuming of a global imperial project of assimilation to Anglo-Saxon U.S. Protestant “civilization” into a global evangelizing project. Ultimately, for Strong, religious training becomes a eugenic tactic as the three social laws of Christ become evolutionary laws, and conversion to Strong’s “Christianity of Christ” becomes the culmination of both God’s plan for humans and the evolution of humans. This paper demonstrates one instance in which racial and theological discourse are intertwined even when devoid of racial markers, and how, in certain instances, theological claims made on behalf of Christianity may also function as claims on behalf of whiteness.
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service
Collection