Publication:
Species-Being and the Badness of Extinction and Death

Thumbnail Image

Date

2018-04

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Nature
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Korsgaard, Christine M. 2018. "Species-Being and the Badness of Extinction and Death." Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 1, no. 1: 143-62.

Research Data

Abstract

This paper offers an account of the property Feuerbach and Marx called “species- being,” the human being’s distinctive tendency to identify herself as a member of her species, and to think of the species as a “we.” It links the notion to Kant’s theory of rights, arguing that every claim of right commits the maker of that claim to something like world government, and therefore to the conception of humanity as a collective agent. It also links species-being to the concept of practical identity, arguing that the conceptions under which we find our lives and actions valuable are ones according to which we make a positive contribution to the life of the species. It then argues that the resulting conception of humanity, together with certain considerations about the nature of the good, provides grounds for challenging the familiar claim that death is generally worse for human beings than for animals. On the other hand, because of species-being, the extinction of our species is a much worse prospect for human beings than for the other animals.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

animals, collective agency, death, extinction, humanity, species-being

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories