Publication: Brief of Amici Curiae Nine Library Organizations and 218 Librarians In Support of Defendant-Appellant Internet Archive
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2023-12-22
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Brief of Amici Curiae Nine Library Organizations and 218 Individual Librarians in Support of Defendant-Appellant, Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, 1:20-cv-04160 (December 22, 2023)
Research Data
Abstract
CDL is based in copyright law and respects the rights of copyright holders by acquiring the works legally, while also broadening access to the books that library systems purchase to build their collections. CDL is a well-established practice in the library community. It is a programmatic tool that represents a reasonable, productive, and viable pathway for libraries to focus on their traditional and well-established role in providing access to their acquired collections. The district court’s finding that books loaned via CDL would replace the market for commercially licensed eBooks was flawed. Books loaned via CDL have distinct features and purposes and are not a substitute for commercially licensed eBooks.
The district court also erred in its finding that the Internet Archive’s Open Libraries program is a “commercial activity” for purposes of fair use. Instead, a library is a non-profit organization that provides access to knowledge and cultural heritage, which is the distinctly non-commercial mission of all libraries.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service