Publication:
Scale issues in atmospheric chemistry modeling

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2017-07-12

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Research Data

Abstract

Accurate simulation of the atmosphere has important implications for climate, air quality, and human health. With increasing computational resources, the complexity of atmospheric models have also increased, resolving more physical and chemical processes that happen on smaller temporal and spatial scales. In this work, I address some of the issues associated with modeling interacting physical and chemical processes that occur on widely different spatiotemporal scales, the tradeoffs between model complexity computational expense, and methods of alleviating some of these errors. Chemical production of ozone and organic aerosols is highly non-linear, which can lead to errors when the subgrid scale variablity in their precursors are not captured. Using aircraft observations of isoprene and NOx over the Southeast US, we find that high-resolution models better capture the spatial segregation of emissions and the subsequent chemical oxidation pathways of these emitted chemicals. However, the cumulative probability distribution functions (CDFs) of NOx, isoprene, and ozone concentrations show little difference across model resolutions and good agreement with observations, suggesting that smaller-scale non-linearities are not important on the regional scale. Off-line chemical transport models (CTMs) use archived meteorological data from a general circulation model (GCM) to drive transport. To reduce computational load, the CTM simulation is often conducted on a coarser grid than the GCM, requiring both spatial and temporal averaging of the meteorological data. This results in significantly reduced vertical transport in the CTM, due to transient organized vertical motions in the GCM (resolved convection) being averaged out. Additional post-processing of the meteorological archive, in particular remapping from cubed-sphere to rectilinear grid also leads to significant errors. Re-computing the convective mass fluxes at the resolution of the CTM and adjusting for bias in the averaged boundary layer heights can partly restore the lost vertical transport in the coarse-resolution CTM simulation.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Atmospheric Sciences

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories