Publication:

Volumetric Arterial Spin-labeled Perfusion Imaging of the Kidneys with a Three-dimensional Fast Spin Echo Acquisition

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016-02

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier BV
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Robson, Philip M., Ananth J. Madhuranthakam, Martin P. Smith, Maryellen R.M. Sun, Weiying Dai, Neil M. Rofsky, Ivan Pedrosa, and David C. Alsop. 2016. “Volumetric Arterial Spin-Labeled Perfusion Imaging of the Kidneys with a Three-Dimensional Fast Spin Echo Acquisition.” Academic Radiology 23 (2): 144–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.013.

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: Renal perfusion measurements using noninvasive arterial spin-labeled (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging techniques are gaining interest. Currently, focus has been on perfusion in the context of renal transplant. Our objectives were to explore the use of ASL in patients with renal cancer, and to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) fast spin echo (FSE) acquisition, a robust volumetric imaging method for abdominal applications. We evaluate 3D ASL perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in the kidneys compared to two-dimensional (2D) ASL in patients and healthy subjects.Materials and Methods: Isotropic resolution (2.6 x 2.6 x 2.8 mm(3)) 3D ASL using segmented FSE was compared to 2D single-shot FSE. ASL used pseudo-continuous labeling, suppression of background signal, and synchronized breathing. Quantitative perfusion values and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared between 3D and 2D ASL in four healthy volunteers and semiquantitative assessments were made by four radiologists in four patients with known renal masses (primary renal cell carcinoma).Results: Renal cortex perfusion in healthy subjects was 284 +/- 21 mL/100 g/min, with test-retest repeatability of 8.8%. No significant differences were found between the quantitative perfusion value and SNR in volunteers between 3D ASL and 2D ASL, or in 3D ASL with synchronized or free breathing. In patients, semiquantitative assessment by radiologists showed no significant difference in image quality between 2D ASL and 3D ASL. In one case, 2D ASL missed a high perfusion focus in a mass that was seen by 3D ASL.Conclusions: 3D ASL renal perfusion imaging provides isotropic-resolution images, with comparable quantitative perfusion values and image SNR in similar imaging time to single-slice 2D ASL.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories