Publication:

The Effects of Varying Cosmological Parameters on Halo Substructure

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Astronomical Society
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Dooley, Gregory A., Brendan F. Griffen, Phillip Zukin, Alexander P. Ji, Mark Vogelsberger, Lars E. Hernquist, and Anna Frebel. 2014. “THE EFFECTS OF VARYING COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ON HALO SUBSTRUCTURE.” The Astrophysical Journal 786 (1): 50. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/50.

Abstract

We investigate how different cosmological parameters, such as those delivered by the WMAP and Planck missions, affect the nature and evolution of the dark matter halo substructure. We use a series of flat. cold dark matter cosmological N-body simulations of structure formation, each with a different power spectrum but with the same initial white noise field. Our fiducial simulation is based on parameters from the WMAP seventh year cosmology. We then systematically vary the spectral index, n(s); matter density, Omega(M); and normalization of the power spectrum, sigma(8), for seven unique simulations. Across these, we study variations in the subhalo mass function, mass fraction, maximum circular velocity function, spatial distribution, concentration, formation times, accretion times, and peak mass. We eliminate dependence of subhalo properties on host halo mass and average the values over many hosts to reduce variance. While the "same" subhalos from identical initial overdensity peaks in higher s(8), n(s), and Omega(m) simulations accrete earlier and end up less massive and closer to the halo center at z = 0, the process of continuous subhalo accretion and destruction leads to a steady state distribution of these properties across all subhalos in a given host. This steady state mechanism eliminates cosmological dependence on all of the properties listed above except for subhalo concentration and V-max, which remain greater for higher s(8), n(s), and Omega(m) simulations, and subhalo formation time, which remains earlier. We also find that the numerical technique for computing the scale radius and the halo finder that were used can significantly affect the concentration-mass relationship as computed for a simulation.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories