Publication:

Inferences of mantle viscosity based on ice age data sets: Radial structure

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Geophysical Union
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Lau, Harriet C. P., Jerry X. Mitrovica, Jacqueline Austermann, Ophelia Crawford, David Al-Attar, and Konstantin Latychev. 2016. “Inferences of Mantle Viscosity Based on Ice Age Data Sets: Radial Structure.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 121 (10): 6991–7012. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb013043.

Abstract

We perform joint nonlinear inversions of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) data, including the following: postglacial decay times in Canada and Scandinavia, the Fennoscandian relaxation spectrum (FRS), late-Holocene differential sea level (DSL) highstands (based on recent compilations of Australian sea level histories), and the rate of change of the degree 2 zonal harmonic of the geopotential, J(2). Resolving power analyses demonstrate the following: (1) the FRS constrains mean upper mantle viscosity to be similar to 3 x 10(20) Pa s, (2) postglacial decay time data require the average viscosity in the top similar to 1500 km of the mantle to be 10(21) Pa s, and (3) the J(2) datum constrains mean lower mantle viscosity to be similar to 5 x 10(21) Pa s. To reconcile (2) and (3), viscosity must increase to 10(22) - 10(23) Pa s in the deep mantle. Our analysis highlights the importance of accurately correcting the J(2) observation for modern glacier melting in order to robustly infer deep mantle viscosity. We also perform a large series of forward calculations to investigate the compatibility of the GIA data sets with a viscosity jump within the lower mantle, as suggested by geodynamic and seismic studies, and conclude that the GIA data may accommodate a sharp jump of 1-2 orders of magnitude in viscosity across a boundary placed in a depth range of 1000-1700 km but does not require such a feature. Finally, we find that no 1-D viscosity profile appears capable of simultaneously reconciling the DSL highstand data and suggest that this discord is likely due to laterally heterogeneous mantle viscosity, an issue we explore in a companion study.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories