Truth and Contradiction in Aristotle's De Interpretatione 6-9

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Truth and Contradiction in Aristotle's De Interpretatione 6-9

Citable link to this page


Title: Truth and Contradiction in Aristotle's De Interpretatione 6-9
Author: Jones, Russell Edward
Citation: Jones, Russell Edward. 2010. Truth and contradiction in Aristotle's De Interpretatione 6-9. Phronesis 55(1): 26-67.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: In De Interpretatione 6-9, Aristotle considers three logical principles: the principle of bivalence, the law of excluded middle, and the rule of contradictory pairs (according to which of any contradictory pair of statements, exactly one is true and the other false). Surprisingly, Aristotle accepts none of these without qualification. I offer a coherent interpretation of these chapters as a whole, while focusing special attention on two sorts of statements that are of particular interest to Aristotle: universal statements not made universally and future particular statements. With respect to the former, I argue that Aristotle takes them to be indeterminate and so to violate the rule of contradictory pairs. With respect to the latter, the subject of the much discussed ninth chapter, I argue that the rule of contradictory pairs, and not the principle of bivalence, is the focus of Aristotle’s refutation. Nevertheless, Aristotle rejects bivalence for future particular statements.
Published Version: doi:10.1163/003188610X12589452898804
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search