Principles for Designing an AI Competition, or Why the Turing Test Fails as an Inducement Prize
Citation
Stuart M. Shieber. 2016. Principles for Designing an AI Competition, or Why the Turing Test Fails as an Inducement Prize. AI Magazine 37 (1): 91–96Abstract
If the artificial intelligence research community is to have a challenge problem as an incentive for research, as many have called for, it behooves us to learn the principles of past successful inducement prize competitions. Those principles argue against the Turing test proper as an appropriate task, despite its appropriateness as a criterion (perhaps the only one) for attributing intelligence to a machine.Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAPCitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27733690
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [17582]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)