Person: Daffner, Kirk
Email Address
AA Acceptance Date
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
First Name
Name
Search Results
Publication Age-related changes in early novelty processing as measured by ERPs
(Elsevier BV, 2009) Riis, Jenna L.; Chong, Hyemi; McGinnnis, Scott; Tarbi, Elise; Sun, Xue; Holcomb, Phillip J.; Rentz, Dorene; Daffner, KirkThis study investigated age-related changes in the early processing of novel visual stimuli using ERPs. Well-matched old (n=30), middle-aged (n=30), and young (n=32) subjects were presented standard, target/rare, and perceptually novel visual stimuli under Attend and Ignore conditions. Our results suggest that the anterior P2 component indexes the motivational salience of a stimulus as determined by either task relevance or novelty. Its enhancement by focused attention does not decrease with age. Its responsiveness to novel stimuli is particularly striking in older adults. The age-related increase in the anterior P2 to novel visual stimuli does not appear to be due to impaired inhibitory control associated with aging. Rather, the enhanced anterior P2 to novel stimuli in older adults may be linked to age-related changes in the process of matching unusual visual stimuli to stored representations, which is indexed by the temporally overlapping anterior N2 component whose amplitude substantially decreases with age.
Publication Compensatory neural activity distinguishes different patterns of normal cognitive aging
(Elsevier BV, 2008) Riis, Jenna L.; Chong, Hyemi; Ryan, Katherine K.; Wolk, David A.; Rentz, Dorene; Holcomb, Phillip J.; Daffner, KirkMost cognitive neuroscientific research exploring the nature of age-associated compensatory mechanisms has compared old adults (high vs. average performers) to young adults (not split by performance), leaving ambiguous whether findings are truly age-related or reflect differences between high and average performers throughout the life span. Here, we examined differences in neural activity (as measured by ERPs) that were generated by high vs. average performing old, middle-age, and young adults while processing novel and target events to investigate the following three questions: (1) Are differences between cognitively high and average performing subjects in the allocation of processing resources (as indexed by P3 amplitude) specific to old subjects, or found throughout the adult life span? (2) Are differences between cognitively high and average performing subjects in speed of processing (as indexed by target P3 latency) of similar magnitude throughout the adult life span? (3) Where along the information processing stream does the compensatory neural activity attributed to cognitively high performing old subjects begin to take place? Our results suggest that high performing old adults successfully manage the task by a compensatory neural mechanism associated with the modulation of controlled processing and the allocation of more resources, whereas high performing younger subjects execute the task more efficiently with fewer resources. Differences between cognitively high and average performers in processing speed increase with age. Middle-age seems to be a critical stage in which substantial differences in neural activity between high and average performers emerge. These findings provide strong evidence for different patterns of age-related changes in the processing of salient environmental stimuli, with cognitive status serving as a key mediating variable.
Publication Cognitive status impacts age-related changes in attention to novel and target events in normal adults.
(American Psychological Association (APA), 2007) Daffner, Kirk; Chong, Hyemi; Riis, Jenna; Rentz, Dorene; Wolk, David A.; Budson, Andrew; Holcomb, Phillip J.In this study, the authors investigated the relationship between the cognitive status of normal adults and age-related changes in attention to novel and target events. Old, middle-age, and young subjects, divided into cognitively high and cognitively average performing groups, viewed repetitive standard stimuli, infrequent target stimuli, and unique novel visual stimuli. Subjects controlled viewing duration by a button press that led to the onset of the next stimulus. They also responded to targets by pressing a foot pedal. The amount of time spent looking at different kinds of stimuli served as a measure of visual attention and exploratory activity. Cognitively high performers spent more time viewing novel stimuli than cognitively average performers. The magnitude of the difference between cognitively high and cognitively average performing groups was largest among old subjects. Cognitively average performers had slower and less accurate responses to targets than cognitively high performers. The results provide strong evidence that the link between engagement by novelty and higher cognitive performance increases with age. Moreover, the results support the notion of there being different patterns of normal cognitive aging and the need to identify the factors that influence them.
Publication Age-Related Differences in Attention to Novelty Among Cognitively High Performing Adults
(Elsevier BV, 2006) Daffner, Kirk; Ryan, Katherine K.; Williams, Danielle M.; Budson, Andrew; Rentz, Dorene; Wolk, David A.; Holcomb, Phillip J.; Ryan, KatherineAge-related differences in attention to novel events were studied in well-matched, cognitively high performing old, middle-aged and young subjects. Event-related potentials were recorded during a visual novelty oddball task in which subjects controlled viewing durations that served as a behavioral measure of attentional allocation. All age groups had a larger P3 amplitude and longer viewing duration to novel than to standard stimuli, with no age-related differences in the magnitude of these effects, indicating old individuals were as engaged by the processing of novelty as younger adults. Old subjects had a larger, more anteriorly distributed P3 component to novels and standards. The increased P3 amplitude differs from prior reports of a diminished P3 response with processes, including aging, that have a potentially deleterious impact on the brain. We hypothesise that cognitively high performing old individuals successfully manage the task by relying on additional neural resources and perhaps more effortful frontal activity than their younger counterparts.