Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales
Author: Gehlbach, Hunter; Brinkworth, Maureen Elizabeth

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Gehlbach, Hunter, and Maureen E. Brinkworth. Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Review of General Psychology 15, no. 4: 380-387.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: For years psychologists across many subfields have undertaken the formidable challenge of designing survey scales to assess attitudes, opinions, and behaviors. Correspondingly, scholars have written much to guide researchers in this undertaking. Yet, many new scales violate established best practices in survey design, suggesting the need for a new approach to designing surveys. This article presents six steps to facilitate the construction of questionnaire scales. Unlike previous processes, this one front-loads input from other academics and potential respondents in the item-development and revision phase with the goal of achieving credibility across both populations. Specifically, the article describes how a (1) literature review and (2) focus group/interview data can be (3) synthesized into a comprehensive list to facilitate (4) the development of items. Next, survey designers can subject the items to (5) an expert review and (6) cognitive pretesting before executing a pilot test.
Published Version: doi:10.1037/a0025704
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8138346
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters