Person:

Strymish, Judith

Abstract Background: Despite recommendations against screening urine for bacteriuria prior to non-urological surgery, it is still a common practice. If the urine culture (Ucx) is positive, clinicians often feel compelled to give targeted therapy or expand the peri-operative prophylaxis (PPX) regimen to cover the urinary organism. Large multicenter studies are lacking. We aimed to evaluate rates and results of preoperative urine screening and postoperative outcomes among a national cohort of surgical patients. Methods: All patients who underwent cardiac, orthopedic implant, or vascular surgery within the national VA health care system during the period from 10/1/08–9/30/13 and had the PPX regimen manually validated were included. Rates of positive Ucx and wound cultures during the 90-day post-operative period were compared between patients with and without pre-operative bacteriuria. Among patients with a positive pre-op urine culture the association between activity of surgical PPX and positive post-op cultures was evaluated. Results: N = 78,810 surgeries were evaluated (21,889 cardiac, 46,565 orthopedic implant, 10,356 vascular). A pre-op Ucx was performed in 26% (Fig); of these, 6.6% were positive and 852 (63%) received PPX active against the uropathogen. Positive pre-op Ucx was associated with higher rates of positive post-op Ucx and wound cultures (Fig). Among patients who received active PPX, post-op Ucx was positive in 46% compared with 39% who received inactive PPX. The rate of post-op wound cultures was not different between patients who received active (25%) vs. inactive (24%) PPX. The pre-op and post-op organisms were the same in 117/221 (52.9%) Ucx and 17/104 (16.3%) wound cultures, respectively. PPX activity did not affect the match rate. Conclusion: This is the largest, multicenter study demonstrating no difference in post-op urine and wound cultures in patients receiving active vs. inactive surgical PPX for pre-op bacteriuria. Prevalence of bacteriuria was similar to other surgical populations. Limitations include predominantly male population and need for further characterization of pre-op antibiotic therapy and UTI and SSI outcomes. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract Background: Identification of patients colonized with C. difficile (CDcol) upon admission and initiation of precautions has been shown to decrease hospital-acquired C. difficileinfection (HA-CDI) in a recent study. We implemented a quality improvement program screening new admissions to a surgical service and evaluated risk factors and outcomes associated with CDcol. Methods: Prospective cohort of all patients admitted to the surgical wards including ICU over a 6 month period 10/16–4/17. Upon admission, a perirectal swab was sent for C diff PCR. Patients with positive screens were placed on contact precautions. CDcol patients were not treated. Testing for CDI was done as usual practice only in patients with diarrhea. Main outcome was prevalence of CDcol and relationship to HA-CDI. Results: Of 708 surgical admissions, 585 (82.6%) patients were screened, 543 were eligible based on first admission; 19 (3.5%) were colonized. Recent surgical hospitalization (OR 13.2, 95% CI 3.4;52.1) and prior CDI (OR 19.5, 95% CI 2.9;127.7) were independent risk factors for CDcol. Antibiotic and PPI use were not associated. Of those with CDcol, 7 developed CDI (36.8%) compared with 5/524 (0.9%) screen negative patients (adj OR 60, 95% CI 12.6;286). CDcol combined with a prior h/o CDI allowed for detection of 8/12 (75%) cases of HA-CDI compared with 3/12 (25%) if only prior history was available. HA-CDI rates on surgical wards after one month post-implementation were 9.3/10,000 bed days of care compared with 12.2 in 2016 and 12.8 in 2015. No delays in bed flow were identified. Conclusion: Admission CDcol prevalence was low in our surgical VA population but was strongly associated with development of HA-CDI. Prior CDI was the strongest risk factor for CDcol and HA-CDI. Knowledge of prior CDI and CDcol status identified 75% of patients who developed CDI, 3 times more than knowledge of prior CDI alone. In certain settings, CDcol screening could improve detection and early isolation of potential CDiff spreaders. Implementation required significant support from administration, nursing and the laboratory, and was successful based on screening percentage without impact on bed flow. Impact on facility CDI rates remains to be fully demonstrated. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.