Person:

Young, Robert

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Young

First Name

Robert

Name

Young, Robert

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Publication

    Whole-Slide Imaging Digital Pathology as a Platform for Teleconsultation: A Pilot Study Using Paired Subspecialist Correlations

    (College of American Pathologists, 2009) Lauwers, Gregory Y.; Wilbur, David; Madi, Kalil; Colvin, Robert; Duncan, Lyn; Faquin, William; Ferry, Judith; Frosch, Matthew; Houser, Stuart L.; Kradin, Richard; Louis, David; Mark, Eugene; Mino-Kenudson, Mari; Misdraji, Joseph; Nielsen, Gunnlauger P.; Pitman, Martha; Rosenberg, Andrew Eric; Smith, R. Neal; Sohani, Aliyah; Stone, James; Tambouret, Rosemary; Wu, Chin-Lee; Young, Robert; Zembowicz, Artur; Wlietmann, Wolfgang

    Context.—Whole-slide imaging technology offers promise for rapid, Internet-based telepathology consultations between institutions. Before implementation, technical issues, pathologist adaptability, and morphologic pitfalls must be well characterized. Objective.—To determine whether interpretation of whole-slide images differed from glass-slide interpretation in difficult surgical pathology cases. Design.—Diagnostically challenging pathology slides from a variety of anatomic sites from an outside laboratory were scanned into whole digital format. Digital and glass slides were independently diagnosed by 2 subspecialty pathologists. Reference, digital, and glass-slide interpretations were compared. Operator comments on technical issues were gathered. Results.—Fifty-three case pairs were analyzed. There was agreement among digital, glass, and reference diagnoses in 45 cases (85%) and between digital and glass diagnoses in 48 (91%) cases. There were 5 digital cases (9%) discordant with both reference and glass diagnoses. Further review of each of these cases indicated an incorrect digital whole-slide interpretation. Neoplastic cases showed better correlation (93%) than did cases of nonneoplastic disease (88%). Comments on discordant cases related to digital whole technology focused on issues such as fine resolution and navigating ability at high magnification. Conclusions.—Overall concordance between digital whole-slide and standard glass-slide interpretations was good at 91%. Adjustments in technology, case selection, and technology familiarization should improve performance, making digital whole-slide review feasible for broader telepathology subspecialty consultation applications.