Person:
Hansen, Jorgen Lindberg

Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Hansen

First Name

Jorgen Lindberg

Name

Hansen, Jorgen Lindberg
Author's Publications: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.baa7b8e9-9d6f-484c-be0b-d1591e79f8b6

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Clinical implementation of a novel applicator in high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of esophageal cancer
    (Termedia Publishing House, 2016) Buzurovic, Ivan; Hansen, Jorgen Lindberg; Bhagwat, Mandar; O'Farrell, Desmond; Friesen, Scott; Harris, Thomas C.; Damato, Antonio L.; Cormack, Robert; Martin, Neil; Devlin, Phillip
    Purpose In this study, we present the clinical implementation of a novel transoral balloon centering esophageal applicator (BCEA) and the initial clinical experience in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment of esophageal cancer, using this applicator. Material and methods Acceptance testing and commissioning of the BCEA were performed prior to clinical use. Full performance testing was conducted including measurements of the dimensions and the catheter diameter, evaluation of the inflatable balloon consistency, visibility of the radio-opaque markers, congruence of the markers, absolute and relative accuracy of the HDR source in the applicator using the radiochromic film and source position simulator, visibility and digitization of the applicator on the computed tomography (CT) images under the clinical conditions, and reproducibility of the offset. Clinical placement of the applicator, treatment planning, treatment delivery, and patient's response to the treatment were elaborated as well. Results: The experiments showed sub-millimeter accuracy in the source positioning with distal position at 1270 mm. The digitization (catheter reconstruction) was uncomplicated due to the good visibility of markers. The treatment planning resulted in a favorable dose distribution. This finding was pronounced for the treatment of the curvy anatomy of the lesion due to the improved repeatability and consistency of the delivered fractional dose to the patient, since the radioactive source was placed centrally within the lumen with respect to the clinical target due to the five inflatable balloons. Conclusions: The consistency of the BCEA positioning resulted in the possibility to deliver optimized non-uniform dose along the catheter, which resulted in an increase of the dose to the cancerous tissue and lower doses to healthy tissue. A larger number of patients and long-term follow-up will be required to investigate if the delivered optimized treatment can lead to improved clinical outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Dose Volume Histogram Analysis of Normal Structures Associated with Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Delivered by High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Comparison with Whole Breast External Beam Radiotherapy Fields
    (BioMed Central, 2008) Stewart, Alexandra J; O'Farrell, Desmond A; Cormack, Robert; Hansen, Jorgen Lindberg; Khan, Atif J.; Mutyala, Subhakar; Devlin, Phillip
    Purpose: To assess the radiation dose delivered to the heart and ipsilateral lung during accelerated partial breast brachytherapy using a MammoSite™ applicator and compare to those produced by whole breast external beam radiotherapy (WBRT). Materials and methods: Dosimetric analysis was conducted on patients receiving MammoSite breast brachytherapy following conservative surgery for invasive ductal carcinoma. Cardiac dose was evaluated for patients with left breast tumors with a CT scan encompassing the entire heart. Lung dose was evaluated for patients in whom the entire lung was scanned. The prescription dose of 3400 cGy was 1 cm from the balloon surface. MammoSite dosimetry was compared to simulated WBRT fields with and without radiobiological correction for the effects of dose and fractionation. Dose parameters such as the volume of the structure receiving 10 Gy or more (V10) and the dose received by 20 cc of the structure (D20), were calculated as well as the maximum and mean doses received. Results: Fifteen patients were studied, five had complete lung data and six had left-sided tumors with complete cardiac data. Ipsilateral lung volumes ranged from 925–1380 cc. Cardiac volumes ranged from 337–551 cc. MammoSite resulted in a significantly lower percentage lung V30 and lung and cardiac V20 than the WBRT fields, with and without radiobiological correction. Conclusion: This study gives low values for incidental radiation received by the heart and ipsilateral lung using the MammoSite applicator. The volume of heart and lung irradiated to clinically significant levels was significantly lower with the MammoSite applicator than using simulated WBRT fields of the same CT data sets. Trial registration: Dana Farber Trial Registry number 03-179