Publication:
Ensuring All Votes Count: Reducing Rejected Ballots

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2022-08

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Altamirano, Jose, and Tova Wang. 2022. “Ensuring All Votes Count: Reducing Rejected Ballots”.

Research Data

Abstract

This brief studies trends in mail ballot rejection rates in 2020 compared to previous years and how different factors, including sets of policies and policy changes, the political environment, and voter outreach, may have contributed to these changes in an extraordinary election year. Our main findings include: Mail ballot rejection rates decreased in most states in 2020 compared to 2018, and a number of states saw a consistent drop from 2016 to 2018 to 2020. Certain states that adapted their voting laws to make mail voting more accessible in 2020, particularly in the South, saw especially pronounced changes in rejection rates. In North Carolina, rejection rates vary from county to county. Previous studies of other states’ rejection rates found similar trends. States that implemented mail ballot policies, including ballot curing, increased ease of access when returning mail ballots at boards of elections, early voting sites, drop boxes, and ballot tracking, saw lower rejection rates than those that didn’t, though we caution against assuming a causal relationship. Previous academic and advocacy research suggests that voters of color, young voters, and first-time voters are disproportionately more likely to have their mail ballots rejected. We highlight these trends and suggest further areas of study that researchers, advocates, organizers, and policymakers can explore to better understand how voters casting their ballots by mail can ensure their votes are counted.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access License Articles (IOAL), as set forth at Terms of Service

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories