Publication: Reimagining Rights and Responsibilities in the United States: Criminal Justice and Public Safety
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2021-02-04
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Carr Center for Human Rights Policy
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Shattuck, John, and Mathias Risse. "Reimagining Rights and Responsibilities in the United States: Criminal Justice and Public Safety." Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, February 10, 2021.
Research Data
Abstract
Starting with the Nixon administration in the early 1970s, and gaining steam throughout the next decade, the prevailing view on criminal justice was that “tough on crime laws make crime rates go down.” That sentiment was predicated on the notion that criminals were not being sufficiently punished for their offenses, and that sentences must be increased—including mandatory minimums and “three strikes laws”—both to remove criminals from communities, and to deter others from committing crimes. The incarceration rate more than tripled between 1980 and its peak in 2008, from 310 to 1,000 prisoners per 100,000 adults—some 2.3 million people in all. Today, the United States leads the world in incarceration, with a rate more than 4 times that of comparable democracies in Western Europe. Reform of the criminal justice system must take into account each stage of the process, respecting the due process rights of individuals throughout their interaction with the system while at the same time bringing criminals to justice and improving overall public safety.
Description
This paper is part of the Reimagining Rights & Responsibilities in the United States Project from the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy.
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service