Publication:

Assessing the U.S. Treasury Department’s Allocations of Funding for Tribal Governments under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2021-12

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Harvard Kennedy School
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Henson, Eric C., Miriam R. Jorgensen, Joseph P. Kalt, and Isabelle G. Leonaitis. "Assessing the U.S. Treasury Department’s Allocations of Funding for Tribal Governments under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021." HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP21-036, December 2021.

Abstract

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“the Act” or “ARPA”) has resulted in the single largest infusion of federal funding for Native America in U.S. history. The core of this funding is 20 billion dollars for the more than 570 federally recognized American Indian and Alaska Native tribal governments. As required by the Act, the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury” or “the Department”) devised and has now implemented a formula for allocating these monies. We find that the allocations that have been made are grossly inequitable and contrary to the policy objectives of Congress, the Biden Administration, and the Treasury Department itself. Treasury’s Formula: Apart from dividing 1 billion dollars of the available 20 billion dollars equally among all tribes, the essence of the Treasury Department’s allocation formula entailed distributing 65% of the ARPA funds for tribal governments based on the number of total tribal citizens served by those governments and distributing the remaining 35% based on tribes’ total number of employees, Native and non-Native, immediately before the COVID-19 pandemic struck. The Result: ARPA’s 20 billion dollars of direct funding was intended to provide relief to tribes because Native American individuals and communities have experienced significant historical disadvantage and have borne significantly disproportionate harms from the pandemic. Correspondingly, within Indian Country, the tribes most in need of assistance are those where extreme disadvantage persists and where the pandemic has been most injurious to Native American individuals, families, and communities. Nonetheless, Treasury’s formula distinctly favored tribes with relatively high proportions of employees relative to enrolled citizens, which tend to be the tribes with strong pre-pandemic economies that financed modern infrastructure and well-funded public services. While these tribes deserve recognition for their accomplishments, they are the tribes that already were in the best position to “build back better.” Yet, Treasury’s formula has resulted in ARPA payments as high as 880,000 dollars per tribal citizen for some “have” tribes. Meanwhile, hundreds of “have not” and “have less” tribes, encompassing 89% of all tribal citizens in the U.S., have received ARPA allocations of less than 10,000 dollars per tribal citizen. Policy Remedies: With the ARPA direct funding monies already distributed to tribes, options for remedying the evident inequities in Treasury’s distributions are limited. However, it still makes sense to: • Create equity offsets by (1) targeting use of ARPA’s 500 million dollars Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund to address the worst inequities, (2) prioritizing disadvantaged tribes in reconciliation, infrastructure, disaster, and other forthcoming funding measures and in other Departments’ funding for tribes, and (3) waiving bureaucratic restrictions on how tribes can use relief and recovery funds; • Create a permanent and appropriately staffed and resourced Office of Tribal Affairs within Treasury in order to build the Department’s capacity and expertise; and • Engage in substantive consultations with tribes that go beyond mere listening to generate useable knowledge and policy options.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories