Publication: The Perpetuation of Prejudice in Reporting on Gays and Lesbians: Time and Newsweek: The First Fifty Years
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
1998-09
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Bennett, Lisa. "The Perpetuation of Prejudice in Reporting on Gays and Lesbians: Time and Newsweek: The First Fifty Years." Shorenstein Center Research Paper Series 1998.R-21, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, September 1998.
Research Data
Abstract
This study reveals that the trend in reporting on gays and lesbians during the past fifty years has been going in the right direction, as the presence of prejudicial—or unsupported and unbalanced—allegations have steadily declined. Yet, more disturbingly, it also finds that prejudicial allegations have continued to appear well into the 1990s—distorting coverage of gays and lesbians in the military, anti-discrimination measures and the more recent issue of gay and lesbian marriage. Among the most significant and consistent findings in this regard have been the implicit assumptions that homosexuality is inherently negative; that gays are sexually predatory; and that gays and lesbians are a threat to children—or, more specifically, that they “recruit,” “seduce” and “molest” children. These assumptions and allegations repeatedly have appeared, without the evidence to support them, and frequently without balance from the gays and lesbians who are subject to them. Moreover, they have continued to appear in spite of the occasional acknowledgment that the evidence on the specific charges that gays and lesbians are sexual predators and child molesters would, in fact, “unseat” them.