Publication: Competitive performance of a modularized deep neural network compared to commercial algorithms for low-dose CT image reconstruction
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2019-06
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Shan, H., Padole, A., Homayounieh, F. et al. Competitive performance of a modularized deep neural network compared to commercial algorithms for low-dose CT image reconstruction. Nat Mach Intell 1, 269–276 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0057-9
Research Data
Abstract
Commercial iterative reconstruction techniques help to reduce CT radiation dose but altered image appearance and artifacts limit their adoptability and potential use. Deep learning has been investigated for low-dose CT (LDCT). Here we design a modularized neural network for LDCT and compared it with commercial iterative reconstruction methods from three leading CT vendors. While popular networks are trained for an end-to-end mapping, our network performs an end-to-process mapping so that intermediate denoised images are obtained with associated noise reduction directions towards a final denoised image. The learned workflow allows radiologists-in-the-loop to optimize the denoising depth in a task-specific fashion. Our network was trained with the Mayo LDCT Dataset, and tested on separate chest and abdominal CT exams from Massachusetts General Hospital. The best deep learning reconstructions were systematically compared to the best iterative reconstructions in a double-blinded reader study. This study confirms that our deep learning approach performed either favorably or comparably in terms of noise suppression and structural fidelity, and is much faster than the commercial iterative reconstruction algorithms.
Description
We have submitted this 30 minutes ago. But the title has been changed and there are some other minor changes in the paper. So the last version is attached in this submission. Sorry for any inconvenience.
We have provided all co-authors here but only the one mentioned above (Atul Padole, Fatemeh Homayounieh, Ruhani Doda Khera, Chayanin Nitiwarangkul and Mannudeep K. Kalra) need waiver.
Thanks, Fatemeh
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
Metadata Only