Publication: Learning and Equilibrium
Open/View Files
Date
2009
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Annual Reviews
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Fudenberg, Drew, and David K. Levine. 2009. Learning and equilibrium. Annual Review of Economics 1: 385–420.
Research Data
Abstract
The theory of learning in games studies how, which and what kind of
equilibria might arise as a consequence of a long-run non-equilibrium process of learning, adaptation and/or imitation. If agents’ strategies are completely observed at the end of each round, and agents are randomly matched with a series of anonymous opponents, fairly simple rules perform well in terms of the agent’s worst-case payoffs, and also guarantee that any steady state of the system must correspond to an equilibrium. If (as in extensive-form games) players do not observe the strategies chosen by their opponents, then learning is consistent with steady states that are not Nash equilibria because players can maintain incorrect beliefs about off-path play. Beliefs can also be
incorrect due to cognitive limitations and systematic inferential errors.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
non-equilibrium dynamics, bounded rationality, Nash equilibrium, selfconfirming equilibrium
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service