Publication:

Measuring the Efficacy of Leaders to Assess Information and Make Decisions in a Crisis: The C-LEAD Scale.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2009

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Hadley, Constance Noonan, Todd L. Pittinsky, S. Amy Sommer, and Weichun Zhu. 2009. Measuring the Efficacy of Leaders to Assess Information and Make Decisions in a Crisis: The C-LEAD Scale. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP09-021, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

Abstract

Based on literature and expert interviews, we developed the Crisis Leader Efficacy in Assessing and Deciding scale (C-LEAD) to capture the efficacy of leaders to assess information and make decisions in a public health and safety crisis. In Studies 1 and 2, we find that C-LEAD predicts decision-making difficulty and confidence in a crisis better than a measure of general leadership efficacy. In Study 3, C-LEAD predicts greater motivation to lead in a crisis, more crisis leader role-taking, and more accurate performance while in a crisis leader role. These findings support the scale’s construct validity and broaden our theoretical understanding of the nature of crisis leader efficacy.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

MLD - Management, Leadership, and Decision Sciences, Leadership, Management, Crisis Management, Public Management, Decision Sciences, Decision Making, Judgement, Individual Decisions, Stress

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories