Publication:
Politically Feasible Emission Target Formulas to Attain 460 ppm CO2 Concentrations

Thumbnail Image

Date

2011

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Bosetti, Valentina, and Jeffrey A. Frankel. 2011. Politically Feasible Emission Target Formulas to Attain 460 ppm CO2 Concentrations. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP11-016, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

Research Data

Abstract

A new climate change treaty must plug three gaps: the absence of emission targets extending far into the future, the absence of participation by the United States, China, and other developing countries, and the absence of reason to expect compliance. To be politically acceptable, it must obey certain constraints regarding country-by-country economic costs. We offer a framework to assign quantitative emission allocations, across countries, one budget period at a time. The two-part plan: (i) China and other developing countries accept targets at BAU in the coming budget period, the same period in which the US first agrees to cuts below BAU; (ii) all countries are asked in the future to make further cuts in accordance with a formula which sums a Progressive Reductions Factor, Latecomer Catch-up Factor, and Gradual Equalization Factor. An earlier proposal for specific parameter values in the formulas achieved the environmental goal that CO2 concentrations plateau at 500 ppm by 2100. It obeyed our political constraints: keeping the economic cost for every country below thresholds of Y=1% of income in Present Discounted Value, and X=5% of income in the worst period. In this paper we attain a concentration goal of 460 ppm CO2, but only by loosening political constraints.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

MBG - Markets, Business, and Government, Environment and Natural Resources, Climate Change, Regulatory Policy, Energy, DEV - International Development, Economic Growth

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories