Publication:

A Critical Review of the “Ladder of Investment” Approach

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2010

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Bourreau, Marc, Pinar Doğan, and Matthieu Manant. 2010. A Critical Review of the "Ladder Investment" Approach. Telecommunications Policy 34(11):683-696.

Abstract

The “ladder of investment” is a regulatory approach proposed by Cave (2006), which has been widely embraced by national regulatory authorities in the European telecommunications sector. The approach entails providing entrants, successively, with different levels of access—the “rungs” of the investment ladder, while inducing them to climb the ladder by setting an access charge that increases over time or by withdrawing access obligations after some pre-determined date (i.e., by setting sunset clauses). Proponents of the ladder of investment approach claim that such regulatory measures would make service-based entry and facility-based entry complements—albeit they have been traditionally viewed as substitutes—in promoting competition. The regulators, thus, have shown a strong interest in this approach. The paper provides a critical review of the ladder of investment approach by setting out its two underlying assumptions and discussing their validity with references to the related industrial organization literature.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

MBG - Markets, Business, and Government, Regulatory Policy, Telecommunications, Ladder of investment, Facility-based competition

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories

Story
A Critical Review of the “Ladder… : DASH Story 2013-06-08
Dear Sir Iam grateful to you for allowing the sharing of this article, otherwise I have to pay for that or just skip it and loose the possible valuable information it contains. Thanks