Publication:

Colocation and Scientific Collaboration: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2012-09-04

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Boudreau, Kevin, Ina Ganguli, Patrick Gaule, Eva Guinan, and Karim Lakhani. "Colocation and Scientific Collaboration: Evidence from a Field Experiment." Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 13-023, August 2012

Abstract

We present the results of a field experiment conducted within the Harvard Medical School system of hospitals and research centers to understand how colocation impacts the likelihood of scientific collaboration. We introduce exogenous colocation and face-to-face interactions for a random subset of biomedical researchers responding to an opportunity to apply for a research grant. While the overall baseline likelihood of any two researchers collaborating is small, we find that random colocation significantly increases the likelihood of pair-level co-application by almost 70%. The effect of exogenous colocation on subsequent collaboration was greater for previous coauthors, pairs including a woman, and pairs researching similar clinical areas. Our results suggest that matching between scientists may be subject to considerable frictions—even among those in relatively close geographic proximity and in the same organizational system. At the same time, even a brief and focused intervention facilitating face-to-face interactions can provide information that impacts the formation of scientific collaborations.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories

Story
Colocation and Scientific Collaboration: Evidence from… : DASH Story 2013-09-13
I am a Family Physician in Ontario where much debate is developing on the success (or failure) of primary care collaborative teams over the last 5 years. While these teams have varying structures they are often "virtual" and not co-located. I have a team that is co-located and highly successful. I believe some of our successes are due to mingling and face time of various professionals that ordinarily would not be in physical contact. It is with great interest that I have searched for your evidence that may support this hunch. As we tackle the challenges of meeting the emerging demands for primary healthcare we would do well to consider this information.