Publication:
Reply to MacFarlane, Scharp, Shapiro, and Wright

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Primary 46972742-2.pdf (143.29 KB)

Date

2012

Authors

Published Version

10.1007/s11098-011-9793-3

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Verlag
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Richard, Mark. 2012. Reply to MacFarlane, Scharp, Shapiro, and Wright. Philosophical Studies 160(3): 477-495.

Research Data

Abstract

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

URI

http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10735582

Collections

FAS Scholarly Articles

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories

Story
Reply to MacFarlane, Scharp, Shapiro, and… : DASH Story 2015-09-29
I am an independent, retired researcher. I do not have access to papers via any organization, nor is it even close to feasible to purchase access either generically or to specific papers from an economic perspective ($48 for a 3-page paper, really?). I may look at 100s or even 1000s of papers to find one or two that are useful. And that is for EACH project. All research papers should be free.