Publication: What Drives the US and Peruvian HIV Epidemics in Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM)?
Open/View Files
Date
2012
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Goodreau, Steven M., Nicole B. Carnegie, Eric Vittinghoff, Javier R. Lama, Jorge Sanchez, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Beryl A. Koblin, Kenneth H. Mayer, and Susan P. Buchbinder. 2012. What drives the US and Peruvian HIV epidemics in men who have sex with men (MSM)? PLoS ONE 7(11): e50522.
Research Data
Abstract
In this work, we estimate the proportions of transmissions occurring in main vs. casual partnerships, and by the sexual role, infection stage, and testing and treatment history of the infected partner, for men who have sex with men (MSM) in the US and Peru. We use dynamic, stochastic models based in exponential random graph models (ERGMs), obtaining inputs from multiple large-scale MSM surveys. Parallel main partnership and casual sexual networks are simulated. Each man is characterized by age, race, circumcision status, sexual role behavior, and propensity for unprotected anal intercourse (UAI); his history is modeled from entry into the adult population, with potential transitions including HIV infection, detection, treatment, AIDS diagnosis, and death. We implemented two model variants differing in assumptions about acute infectiousness, and assessed sensitivity to other key inputs. Our two models suggested that only 4–5% (Model 1) or 22–29% (Model 2) of HIV transmission results from contacts with acute-stage partners; the plurality (80–81% and 49%, respectively) stem from chronic-stage partners and the remainder (14–16% and 27–35%, respectively) from AIDS-stage partners. Similar proportions of infections stem from partners whose infection is undiagnosed (24–31%), diagnosed but untreated (36–46%), and currently being treated (30–36%). Roughly one-third of infections (32–39%) occur within main partnerships. Results by country were qualitatively similar, despite key behavioral differences; one exception was that transmission from the receptive to insertive partner appears more important in Peru (34%) than the US (21%). The broad balance in transmission contexts suggests that education about risk, careful assessment, pre-exposure prophylaxis, more frequent testing, earlier treatment, and risk-reduction, disclosure, and adherence counseling may all contribute substantially to reducing the HIV incidence among MSM in the US and Peru.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Biology, Population Biology, Epidemiology, Social Epidemiology, Computer Science, Computerized Simulations, Medicine, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Viral Diseases, HIV, HIV epidemiology, HIV prevention, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Genitourinary Infections, Public Health, Urology, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Sociology, Social Networks, Veterinary Science, Animal Management, Animal Behavior, Sexual Behavior
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service