Publication:
Unexpected benefits of deciding by mind wandering

Thumbnail Image

Date

2013

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Frontiers Media S.A.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Giblin, Colleen E., Carey K. Morewedge, and Michael I. Norton. 2013. “Unexpected benefits of deciding by mind wandering.” Frontiers in Psychology 4 (1): 598. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00598. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00598.

Research Data

Abstract

The mind wanders, even when people are attempting to make complex decisions. We suggest that mind wandering—allowing one's thoughts to wander until the “correct” choice comes to mind—can positively impact people's feelings about their decisions. We compare post-choice satisfaction from choices made by mind wandering to reason-based choices and randomly assigned outcomes. Participants chose a poster by mind wandering or deliberating, or were randomly assigned a poster. Whereas forecasters predicted that participants who chose by mind wandering would evaluate their outcome as inferior to participants who deliberated (Experiment 1), participants who used mind wandering as a decision strategy evaluated their choice just as positively as did participants who used deliberation (Experiment 2). In some cases, it appears that people can spare themselves the effort of deliberation and instead “decide by wind wandering,” yet experience no decrease in satisfaction.

Description

Keywords

decision strategies, post-choice satisfaction, mind wandering, spontaneous thought, deliberation

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories