Publication: What Goes Up Must Come Down? Experimental Evidence on Intuitive Forecasting
Loading...
Open/View Files
Date
2013
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Economic Association
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Beshears, John, James J Choi, Andreas Fuster, David Laibson, and Brigitte C Madrian. 2013. “What Goes Up Must Come Down? Experimental Evidence on Intuitive Forecasting.” American Economic Review 103 (3) (May): 570–574.
Abstract
Do laboratory subjects correctly perceive the dynamics of a mean-reverting time series? In our experiment, subjects receive historical data and make forecasts at different horizons. The time series process that we use features short-run momentum and long-run partial mean reversion. Half of the subjects see a version of this process in which the momentum and partial mean reversion unfold over ten periods ("fast"), while the other subjects see a version with dynamics that unfold over 50 periods ("slow"). Typical subjects recognize most of the mean reversion of the fast process and none of the mean reversion of the slow process.
Description
Research Data
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service