Publication: The Neural Bases of Directed and Spontaneous Mental State Attributions to Group Agents
Open/View Files
Date
2014
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Jenkins, Adrianna C., David Dodell-Feder, Rebecca Saxe, and Joshua Knobe. 2014. “The Neural Bases of Directed and Spontaneous Mental State Attributions to Group Agents.” PLoS ONE 9 (8): e105341. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105341.
Research Data
Abstract
In daily life, perceivers often need to predict and interpret the behavior of group agents, such as corporations and governments. Although research has investigated how perceivers reason about individual members of particular groups, less is known about how perceivers reason about group agents themselves. The present studies investigate how perceivers understand group agents by investigating the extent to which understanding the ‘mind’ of the group as a whole shares important properties and processes with understanding the minds of individuals. Experiment 1 demonstrates that perceivers are sometimes willing to attribute a mental state to a group as a whole even when they are not willing to attribute that mental state to any of the individual members of the group, suggesting that perceivers can reason about the beliefs and desires of group agents over and above those of their individual members. Experiment 2 demonstrates that the degree of activation in brain regions associated with attributing mental states to individuals—i.e., brain regions associated with mentalizing or theory-of-mind, including the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), and precuneus—does not distinguish individual from group targets, either when reading statements about those targets' mental states (directed) or when attributing mental states implicitly in order to predict their behavior (spontaneous). Together, these results help to illuminate the processes that support understanding group agents themselves.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Biology and Life Sciences, Neuroscience, Brain Mapping, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cognitive Science, Cognitive Psychology, Social Cognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroimaging, Psychology, Experimental Psychology, Social Psychology, Social Sciences, Philosophy
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service