Publication: Emerging therapies and challenges in spinal muscular atrophy
Open/View Files
Date
2017
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Farrar, Michelle A., Susanna B. Park, Steve Vucic, Kate A. Carey, Bradley J. Turner, Thomas H. Gillingwater, Kathryn J. Swoboda, and Matthew C. Kiernan. 2017. “Emerging therapies and challenges in spinal muscular atrophy.” Annals of Neurology 81 (3): 355-368. doi:10.1002/ana.24864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.24864.
Research Data
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a hereditary neurodegenerative disease with severity ranging from progressive infantile paralysis and premature death (type I) to limited motor neuron loss and normal life expectancy (type IV). Without disease‐modifying therapies, the impact is profound for patients and their families. Improved understanding of the molecular basis of SMA, disease pathogenesis, natural history, and recognition of the impact of standardized care on outcomes has yielded progress toward the development of novel therapeutic strategies and are summarized. Therapeutic strategies in the pipeline are appraised, ranging from SMN1 gene replacement to modulation of SMN2 encoded transcripts, to neuroprotection, to an expanding repertoire of peripheral targets, including muscle. With the advent of preliminary trial data, it can be reasonably anticipated that the SMA treatment landscape will transform significantly. Advancement in presymptomatic diagnosis and screening programs will be critical, with pilot newborn screening studies underway to facilitate preclinical diagnosis. The development of disease‐modifying therapies will necessitate monitoring programs to determine the long‐term impact, careful evaluation of combined treatments, and further acceleration of improvements in supportive care. In advance of upcoming clinical trial results, we consider the challenges and controversies related to the implementation of novel therapies for all patients and set the scene as the field prepares to enter an era of novel therapies. Ann Neurol 2017;81:355–368
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Review
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service