Publication:

Don’t panic: Interpretation bias is predictive of new onsets of panic disorder

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier BV
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Woud, Marcella L., Xiao Chi Zhang, Eni S. Becker, Richard J. McNally, and Jürgen Margraf. 2014. “Don’t Panic: Interpretation Bias Is Predictive of New Onsets of Panic Disorder.” Journal of Anxiety Disorders 28 (1) (January): 83–87. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.11.008.

Abstract

Psychological models of panic disorder postulate that interpretation of ambiguous material as threatening is an important maintaining factor for the disorder. However, demonstrations of whether such a bias predicts onset of panic disorder are missing. In the present study, we used data from the Dresden Prediction Study, in which a epidemiologic sample of young German women was tested at two time points approximately 17 months apart, allowing the study of biased interpretation as a potential risk factor. At time point one, participants completed an Interpretation Questionnaire including two types of ambiguous scenarios: panic-related and general threat-related. Analyses revealed that a panic-related interpretation bias predicted onset of panic disorder, even after controlling for two established risk factors: anxiety sensitivity and fear of bodily sensations. This is the first prospective study demonstrating the incremental validity of interpretation bias as a predictor of panic disorder onset.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

interpretation bias, panic disorder, risk factor, prospective, anxiety sensitivity, fear of bodily sensations

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories