Publication:

Assistance magnitude versus metabolic cost reductions for a tethered multiarticular soft exosuit

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Quinlivan, B. T., S. Lee, P. Malcolm, D. M. Rossi, M. Grimmer, C. Siviy, N. Karavas, et al. 2017. “Assistance Magnitude Versus Metabolic Cost Reductions for a Tethered Multiarticular Soft Exosuit.” Science Robotics 2 (2) (January 18): eaah4416. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aah4416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aah4416.

Abstract

When defining requirements for any wearable robot for walking assistance it is paramount to maximize the user’s net metabolic benefit, while limiting the metabolic penalty of carrying the system’s mass. Thus, the aim of this study was to isolate and characterize the relationship between assistance magnitude and the metabolic cost of walking while also examining changes to the wearer’s underlying gait mechanics. The study was performed with a tethered multiarticular soft exosuit during normal walking where assistance was directly applied at the ankle joint and indirectly at the hip due to a textile architecture. The exosuit controller was designed such that the delivered torque profile at the ankle joint approximated that of the biological torque during normal walking. Seven subjects walked on a treadmill at 1.5 m s-1 in one unpowered and four powered conditions where the peak moment applied at the ankle joint was varied from approximately 10% to 38% of biological ankle moment (equivalent to an applied force of 18.7% to 75.0% of body weight). Results showed that with increasing peak exosuit ankle moment, net metabolic rate continually decreased within the tested range. When maximum assistance was applied, the metabolic rate of walking was reduced by 22.83 ± 3.17% relative to the powered-off condition (mean ± s.e.m.).

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories