Publication: The Price of Racial Bias: Intergroup Negotiations in the Ultimatum Game
Date
2013
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SAGE Publications
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Kubota, Jennifer T., Jian Li, Eyal Bar-David, Mahzarin R. Banaji, and Elizabeth A. Phelps. 2013. The price of racial bias: Intergroup negotiations in the Ultimatum Game. Psychological Science 24, no. 12: 2498–2504. doi:10.1177/0956797613496435.
Research Data
Abstract
Existing stereotypes about Black Americans may influence perceptions of intent during financial negotiations. In this study, we explored whether the influence of race on economic decisions extends to choices that are costly to the decision maker. We investigated whether racial group membership contributes to differential likelihood of rejection of objectively equal unfair monetary offers. In the Ultimatum Game, players accept or reject proposed splits of money. Players keep accepted splits, but if a player rejects an offer, both the player and the proposer receive nothing. We found that participants accepted more offers and lower offer amounts from White proposers than from Black proposers, and that this pattern was accentuated for participants with higher implicit race bias. These findings indicate that participants are willing to discriminate against Black proposers even at a cost to their own financial gain.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
decision making, implicit race bias, behavioral economics, Ultimatum Game, racial and ethical attitudes and relations, intergroup dynamics, prejudice, social behavior
Terms of Use
Metadata Only