Publication:

Failure to CAPTCHA Attention: Null Results from an Honesty Priming Experiment in Guatemala

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2017

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MDPI
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Kettle, Stewart, Marco Hernandez, Michael Sanders, Oliver Hauser, and Simon Ruda. 2017. “Failure to CAPTCHA Attention: Null Results from an Honesty Priming Experiment in Guatemala.” Behavioral Sciences 7 (2): 28. doi:10.3390/bs7020028. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs7020028.

Abstract

We report results from a large online randomised tax experiment in Guatemala. The trial involves short messages and choices presented to taxpayers as part of a CAPTCHA pop-up window immediately before they file a tax return, with the aim of priming honest declarations. In total our sample includes 627,242 taxpayers and 3,232,430 tax declarations made over four months. Treatments include: honesty declaration; information about public goods; information about penalties for dishonesty, questions allowing a taxpayer to choose which public good they think tax money should be spent on; or questions allowing a taxpayer to state a view on the penalty for not declaring honestly. We find no impact of any of these treatments on the average amount of tax declared. We discuss potential causes for this null effect and implications for ‘online nudges’ around honesty priming.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

tax compliance, behavioural economics, randomised field experiments, international development

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories