Publication:

Computed Tomography-Based Muscle Attenuation and Electrical Impedance Myography as Indicators of Trunk Muscle Strength Independent of Muscle Size in Older Adults

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Anderson, Dennis E., Jonathan F. Bean, Nicole E. Holt, John C. Keel, and Mary L. Bouxsein. 2014. “Computed Tomography-Based Muscle Attenuation and Electrical Impedance Myography as Indicators of Trunk Muscle Strength Independent of Muscle Size in Older Adults.” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 93 (7) (July): 553–561. doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000059.

Abstract

Objective—To examine the associations of computed tomography (CT) -based x-ray attenuation and paraspinal electrical impedance myography (EIM) measures of trunk muscles with absolute and relative (normalized by body weight) trunk extension strength, independent of muscle cross- sectional area (CSA). Design—A cross-sectional study of mobility-limited community dwelling older adults (34 women, 15 men, mean age 78.2±7.2 years) recruited from within an existing prospective research cohort. Trunk extension strength, CT-based trunk muscle CSA and attenuation at L4 level, and paraspinal EIM measures were collected. Results—Attenuation was positively correlated with absolute and relative strength for multiple muscle groups (r = 0.32 to 0.61, p < 0.05). Paraspinal EIM phase was positively correlated with paraspinal attenuation (r = 0.30, p = 0.039) and with relative strength (r = 0.30, p = 0.042). In multivariable linear regressions adjusting for sex and CSA, attenuations of the anterior abdominal muscles (semipartial r2 = 0.11, p = 0.013) and combined muscles (semipartial r2 = 0.07, p = 0.046) were associated with relative strength. Conclusions—While attenuation was associated with relative strength, small effect sizes indicate limited usefulness as clinical measures of muscle strength independent of muscle size. However, there remains a need for additional studies in larger and more diverse groups of subjects.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories