Publication: Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends
Open/View Files
Date
2017
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Thompson, Jonathan R., Joshua S. Plisinski, Pontus Olofsson, Christopher E. Holden, and Matthew J. Duveneck. 2017. “Forest loss in New England: A projection of recent trends.” PLoS ONE 12 (12): e0189636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189636.
Research Data
Abstract
New England has lost more than 350,000 ha of forest cover since 1985, marking a reversal of a two-hundred-year trend of forest expansion. We a cellular land-cover change model to project a continuation of recent trends (1990–2010) in forest loss across six New England states from 2010 to 2060. Recent trends were estimated using a continuous change detection algorithm applied to twenty years of Landsat images. We addressed three questions: (1) What would be the consequences of a continuation of the recent trends in terms of changes to New England's forest cover mosaic? (2) What social and biophysical attributes are most strongly associated with recent trends in forest loss, and how do these vary geographically? (3) How sensitive are projections of forest loss to the reference period—i.e. how do projections based on the period spanning 1990-to-2000 differ from 2000-to-2010, or from the full period, 1990-to-2010? Over the full reference period, 8201 ha yr-1 and 468 ha yr-1 of forest were lost to low- and high-density development, respectively. Forest loss was concentrated in suburban areas, particularly near Boston. Of the variables considered, 'distance to developed land' was the strongest predictor of forest loss. The next most important predictor varied geographically: 'distance to roads' ranked second in the more developed regions in the south and 'population density' ranked second in the less developed north. The importance and geographical variation in predictor variables were relatively stable between reference periods. In contrast, there was 55% more forest loss during the 1990-to-2000 reference period compared to the 2000-to-2010 period, highlighting the importance of understanding the variation in reference periods when projecting land cover change. The projection of recent trends is an important baseline scenario with implications for the management of forest ecosystems and the services they provide.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Biology and Life Sciences, Ecology, Forest Ecology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems, Forests, Terrestrial Environments, Population Biology, Population Metrics, Population Density, Earth Sciences, Geography, Geographic Areas, Urban Areas, Survey Research, Census, Biophysics, Physical Sciences, Physics, Human Geography, Land Use, Social Sciences
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service