Publication: The Challenges of First-in-Human Stem Cell Clinical Trials: What Does This Mean for Ethics and Institutional Review Boards?
Open/View Files
Date
2018
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Barker, Roger A., Melissa K. Carpenter, Stuart Forbes, Steven A. Goldman, Catriona Jamieson, Charles E. Murry, Jun Takahashi, and Gordon Weir. 2018. “The Challenges of First-in-Human Stem Cell Clinical Trials: What Does This Mean for Ethics and Institutional Review Boards?” Stem Cell Reports 10 (5): 1429-1431. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.04.010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.04.010.
Research Data
Abstract
Stem cell-based clinical interventions are increasingly advancing through preclinical testing and approaching clinical trials. The complexity and diversity of these approaches, and the confusion created by unproven and untested stem cell-based “therapies,” create a growing need for a more comprehensive review of these early-stage human trials to ensure they place the patients at minimal risk of adverse events but are also based on solid evidence of preclinical efficacy with a clear scientific rationale for that effect. To address this issue and supplement the independent review process, especially that of the ethics and institutional review boards who may not be experts in stem cell biology, the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) has developed a set of practical questions to cover the major issues for which clear evidence-based answers need to be obtained before approving a stem cell-based trial.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
human stem cell-derived interventions, early phase clinical trials, institutional review and ethics boards, review process, guidelines
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service