Publication: Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?
Open/View Files
Date
2017
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SAGE Publications
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Benartzi, Shlomo, John Beshears, Katherine L. Milkman, Cass R. Sunstein, Richard H. Thaler, Maya Shankar, Will Tucker-Ray, William J. Congdon, and Steven Galing. 2017. “Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?” Psychological Science 28 (8): 1041-1055. doi:10.1177/0956797617702501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501.
Research Data
Abstract
Governments are increasingly adopting behavioral science techniques for changing individual behavior in pursuit of policy objectives. The types of “nudge” interventions that governments are now adopting alter people’s decisions without coercion or significant changes to economic incentives. We calculated ratios of impact to cost for nudge interventions and for traditional policy tools, such as tax incentives and other financial inducements, and we found that nudge interventions often compare favorably with traditional interventions. We conclude that nudging is a valuable approach that should be used more often in conjunction with traditional policies, but more calculations are needed to determine the relative effectiveness of nudging.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
nudge, nudge unit, choice architecture, behavioral science, behavioral economics, savings, pension plan, education, college enrollment, energy, electricity usage, preventive health, influenza vaccination, flu shot, open materials
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service