Publication: Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2014-02-21
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
IOP Publishing
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Twyford, Perry, Changsi Cai, Shelley Fried. "Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells." Journal of Neural Engineering 11, no. 2 (2014): 025001. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/025001
Research Data
Abstract
Objective
The field of retinal prosthetics for artificial vision has advanced considerably in recent years, however clinical outcomes remain inconsistent. The performance of retinal prostheses is likely limited by the inability of electrical stimuli to preferentially activate different types of retinal ganglion cell (RGC).
Approach
Here we examine the response of rabbit RGCs to high-frequency stimulation, using biphasic pulses applied at 2000 pulses per second. Responses were recorded using cell-attached patch clamp methods, and stimulation was applied epiretinally via a small cone electrode.
Results
When prolonged stimulus trains were applied to OFF-Brisk Transient (BT) RGCs, the cells exhibited a non-monotonic relationship between response strength and stimulus amplitude; this response pattern was different from those elicited previously by other electrical stimuli. When the amplitude of the stimulus was modulated transiently from a non-zero baseline amplitude, ON-BT and OFF-BT cells exhibited different activity patterns: ON cells showed an increase in activity while OFF cells exhibited a decrease in activity. Using a different envelope to modulate the amplitude of the stimulus, we observed the opposite effect: ON cells exhibited a decrease in activity while OFF cells show an increase in activity.
Significance
As ON and OFF RGCs often exhibit opposing activity patterns in response to light stimulation, this work suggests that high-frequency electrical stimulation of RGCs may be able to elicit responses that are more physiological than traditional pulsatile stimuli. Additionally, the prospect of an electrical stimulus capable of cell-type specific selective activation has broad applications throughout the fields of neural stimulation and neuroprostheses.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service