Publication: The Dynamics of Economic Complexity and the Product Space over a 42 year period
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2009-12
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Center for International Development at Harvard University
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Hidalgo, César A. “The Dynamics of Economic Complexity and the Product Space over a 42 year period.” CID Working Paper Series 2009.189, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, December 2009.
Research Data
Abstract
How does the productive structure of countries' changes over time? In this paper we explore this question by combining techniques of networks science with 42 years of trade data and find that, while the Product Space remains relatively stable during this period, the dynamics of countries' productive structures is characterized by a few highly dynamic economies. In particular we identify Brazil, Indonesia, Turkey, Malaysia, Thailand, Korea, Singapore and China, as countries that transformed their productive structures considerably during these four decades, albeit following different trajectories. For instance, the economic complexity of Korea, Singapore and China was relatively high at the beginning of the observation period and continued to increase during these forty two years, moving these countries into the top spots of the economic complexity rankings for the beginning of this millennium. Brazil, Indonesia and Turkey, on the other hand, transformed their productive structures significantly during the same period of time, but did so starting from a less sophisticated foundation. We conclude the paper by moving from this and other observations into the policy implications of this view of economic development and argue that the government involvement in the private sector should be to help catalyze market activities and solve coordination problems that emerge naturally when countries try to accumulate capabilities. This represents an alternative to more traditional views of the role of government that postulate, in their extremes, that the public sector should either have no involvement in private sector activities or, on the other hand, substantial ownership of the means of production.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service