Do Political Protests Matter? Evidence from the Tea Party Movement
Open/View files
Date
2013
Author(s)
Madestam, A.
Veuger, S.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Madestam, A., D. Shoag, S. Veuger, and D. Yanagizawa-Drott. 2013. “Do Political Protests Matter? Evidence from the Tea Party Movement.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (4) (August 11): 1633–1685. doi:10.1093/qje/qjt021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt021.
Abstract
Can protests cause political change, or are they merely symptoms of underlying shifts in policy preferences? We address this question by studying the Tea Party movement in the United States, which rose to prominence through coordinated rallies across the country on Tax Day, April 15, 2009. We exploit variation in rainfall on the day of these rallies as an exogenous source of variation in attendance. We show that good weather at this initial, coordinating event had significant consequences for the subsequent local strength of the movement, increased public support for Tea Party positions, and led to more Republican votes in the 2010 midterm elections. Policy making was also affected, as incumbents responded to large protests in their district by voting more conservatively in Congress. Our estimates suggest significant multiplier effects: an additional protester increased the number of Republican votes by a factor well above 1. Together our results show that protests can build political movements that ultimately affect policy making and that they do so by influencing political views rather than solely through the revelation of existing political preferences
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service
Collection