Humblebragging: A Distinct – and Ineffective – Self-Presentation Strategy

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Humblebragging: A Distinct – and Ineffective – Self-Presentation Strategy

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Humblebragging: A Distinct – and Ineffective – Self-Presentation Strategy
Author: Sezer, Ovul; Gino, Francesca; Norton, Michael Irwin

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Sezer, Ovul, Francesca Gino, and Michael I. Norton. "Humblebragging: A Distinct – and Ineffective – Self-Presentation Strategy." Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 15-080, April 2015.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Humblebragging – bragging masked by a complaint – is a distinct and, given the rise of social media, increasingly ubiquitous form of self-promotion. We show that although people often choose to humblebrag when motivated to make a good impression, it is an ineffective self-promotional strategy. Five studies offer both correlational and causal evidence that humblebragging has both global costs – reducing liking and perceived sincerity – and specific costs: it is even ineffective in signaling the specific trait that that a person wants to promote. Moreover, humblebragging is less effective than simply complaining, because complainers are at least seen as sincere. Despite people’s belief that combining bragging and complaining confers the benefits of both self-promotion strategies, humblebragging fails to pay off.
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:14725901
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters