• Login
View Item 
  • DASH Home
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences
  • FAS Scholarly Articles
  • View Item
  • DASH Home
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences
  • FAS Scholarly Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of DASH
  • Communities & Collections
  • By Issue Date
  • Author
  • Title
  • Keyword
  • FAS Department
This Collection
  • By Issue Date
  • Author
  • Title
  • Keyword
  • FAS Department

Submitters

  • Login
  • Quick submit
  • Waiver Generator

About

  • About DASH
  • DASH Stories
  • DASH FAQs
  • Accessibility
  • COVID-related Research
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Statistics

  • By Schools
  • By Collections
  • By Departments
  • By Items
  • By Country
  • By Authors

Dirty Work, Clean Hands: The Moral Psychology of Indirect Agency

 
Thumbnail
View/Open
Greene_CleanHands.pdf (261.9Kb)
Author
Paharia, Neeru
Kassam, Karim SadikHARVARD
Greene, Joshua D.HARVARD
Bazerman, Max H.HARVARD
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.002
Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Paharia, Neeru, Karim S. Kassam, Joshua D. Greene, and Max H. Bazerman. 2009. Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109(2): 134-141.
Abstract
When powerful people cause harm, they often do so indirectly through other people. Are harmful actions carried out through others evaluated less negatively than harmful actions carried out directly? Four experiments examine the moral psychology of indirect agency. Experiments 1A, 1B, and 1C reveal effects of indirect agency under conditions favoring intuitive judgment, but not reflective judgment, using a joint/separate evaluation paradigm. Experiment 2A demonstrates that effects of indirect agency cannot be fully explained by perceived lack of foreknowledge or control on the part of the primary agent. Experiment 2B indicates that reflective moral judgment is sensitive to indirect agency, but only to the extent that indirectness signals reduced foreknowledge and/or control. Experiment 3 indicates that effects of indirect agency result from a failure to automatically consider the potentially dubious motives of agents who cause harm indirectly. Experiment 4 demonstrates an effect of indirect agency on purchase intentions.
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4264764

Collections
  • FAS Scholarly Articles [17574]
  • HBS Scholarly Articles [705]

Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)

Follow us on TwitterFollow us on FacebookFollow us on Google+

e: osc@harvard.edu

t: +1 (617) 495 4089

f: +1 (617) 495 0370

© 2018 President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • DASH
  • ETDs@Harvard
  • Copyright First Responders
  • HOPE
  • Contact
  • Harvard Library
  • Harvard University