Publication:

Choosing To Be "Good": How Managers Determine Their Impact on Financial and Social Performance

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2015-07-29

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Hong, Bryan, and Dylan Minor. Choosing To Be "Good": How Managers Determine Their Impact on Financial and Social Performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 16-011, July 2015.

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between a manager’s influence on firm financial and social performance. To examine the mechanism governing the relationship between a manager’s investment decisions along both dimensions of performance, we use a formal agency theory model to develop testable implications. In our empirical results, we find that a manager’s influence on firm CSR activities is negatively related to their influence on financial performance. Also, as suggested by the implications of the model, we find that managers who operate in industries with more volatile financial performance and receive a lower share of compensation from incentive-based pay are more likely to have a positive influence on firm social performance.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories

Story
Choosing To Be "Good": How Managers… : DASH Story 2016-03-17
Jim Rohn wrote that a formal education will earn you a living but self education will earn you a fortune. That's what this is for me.